How can think about you

Critical thinking requires the development and use of foresight as far as this is possible. Implementing the decisions made arising from critical thinking must take into account an assessment of possible outcomes and ways of avoiding potentially negative outcomes, or at least lessening their impact. It might be thought that we are overextending our demands on critical thinking in expecting that it can help to construct focused meaning rather than examining the information given and the knowledge we have acquired to see if we can, if necessary, construct a meaning that will be acceptable and useful.

After all, almost no information we have available to us, either externally or internally, carries any guarantee of its life or appropriateness. Search SkillsYouNeed:. We'll never share your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time. Critical Thinking is: A way of thinking about particular things at a particular time; it is not the accumulation of facts and knowledge or something that you can learn once and then use in that form forever, such as the nine times table you learn and use in school.

Then ask yourself the following questions: Who said it? What did they say? Where did they say it? When did they say it?

Was it before, during or after an important event? Is timing important? Why did they say it? How did they say it? Further Reading from Skills You Need. Design Thinking is extremely useful in tackling problems that are ill-defined or unknown, by re-framing the problem in human-centric ways, creating many ideas in Brainstorming sessions, and adopting a hands-on approach in Prototyping and testing.

Design Thinking also involves ongoing experimentation: Sketching , Prototyping , testing, and trying out concepts and ideas. There are many variants of the Design Thinking process in use today, and they have from three to seven phases, stages, or modes. However, all variants of Design Thinking are very similar. Here, we will focus on the five-phase model proposed by the Hasso-Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford, which is also known as d. The five phases of Design Thinking, according to d.

It is important to note that the five phases, stages, or modes are not always sequential. They do not have to follow any specific order and can often occur in parallel and repeat iteratively.

Given that, you should not understand the phases as a hierarchical or step-by-step process. Instead, you should look at it as an overview of the modes or phases that contribute to an innovative project, rather than sequential steps.

To help you understand Design Thinking, we have broken the process into five phases or modes, which are: 1. Empathise, 2. Define, 3. Ideate, 4. Prototype, and 5. In the same way, all great innovators in literature, art, music, science, engineering and business have practiced it and still practice it.

Sometimes, the easiest way to understand something intangible, such as Design Thinking, is by understanding what it is not. Humans naturally develop patterns of thinking modeled on repetitive activities and commonly accessed knowledge.

These assist us in quickly applying the same actions and knowledge in similar or familiar situations, but they also have the potential to prevent us from quickly and easily accessing or developing new ways of seeing, understanding and solving problems.

These patterns of thinking are often referred to as schemas , which are organized sets of information and relationships between things, actions and thoughts that are stimulated and initiated in the human mind when we encounter some environmental stimuli.

A single schema can contain a vast amount of information. For example, we have a schema for dogs which encompasses the presence of four legs, fur, sharp teeth, a tail, paws, and a number of other perceptible characteristics. When the environmental stimuli match this schema — even when there is a tenuous link or only a few of the characteristics are present — the same pattern of thought is brought into the mind.

As these schemas are stimulated automatically, this can obstruct a more fitting impression of the situation or prevent us from seeing a problem in a way that will enable a new problem-solving strategy.

Thinking outside of the box can provide an innovative solution to a sticky problem. However, thinking outside of the box can be a real challenge as we naturally develop patterns of thinking that are modeled on the repetitive activities and commonly accessed knowledge we surround ourselves with.

Some years ago, an incident occurred where a truck driver tried to pass under a low bridge. But he failed, and the truck was lodged firmly under the bridge. The driver was unable to continue driving through or reverse out.

The story goes that as the truck became stuck, it caused massive traffic problems, which resulted in emergency personnel, engineers, firefighters and truck drivers gathering to devise and negotiate various solutions for dislodging the trapped vehicle.

Emergency workers were debating whether to dismantle parts of the truck or chip away at parts of the bridge. Each spoke of a solution which fitted within his or her respective level of expertise. A boy walking by and witnessing the intense debate looked at the truck, at the bridge, then looked at the road and said nonchalantly, "Why not just let the air out of the tires?

So it is with any other form of thought. You do your best thinking by slowing down and concentrating. One heuristic to tell how good someone is at making decisions is by how much time they have. The busiest people are often the ones who make the worst decisions. Busy people spend a lot of time correcting poor decisions. Read Next. Thinking Reading Time: 4 minutes.

But how can we learn how to think? Improving Thinking The best way to improve your ability to think is to actually spend time thinking. Your decisions do the talking for your thinking. We know from Bandura that self-efficacy is particularly important when individuals face adversity. Adversity is generally defined as difficult, challenging or unpleasant events, situations or circumstances. These people are considered to be resilient and resiliency is considered an asset because of its obvious benefits.

One way to explore the specific behaviours associated with self-efficacy is to investigate how it relates to resilience and resilient or adaptive responses. Because of this and because understanding issues of student achievement and wellbeing is a priority for those of us working in the field of psychology and education, my study focussed on academic self-efficacy and academic resilience in undergraduate students.

A second version of the case study described a fellow student who was facing the same academic adversity and students were now asked to select, from the same list of behaviours, how their colleague should respond. OK, what did the study find? So far findings show that academic self-efficacy is a strong predictor of academic resilience. Positive self-efficacy beliefs predict increased resilience in undergraduate students when faced with academic adversity.

This finding is important but was anticipated, so no surprises there.